He says health care is so complex, that in order to get a handle on it we need to first experiment on a small scale with a bunch of different ideas, and that a similar idea revolutionized agriculture. It's a good read, but I'm not sure I buy it.
Almost half of it is devoted to programs that would test various ways to curb costs and increase quality. The bill is a hodgepodge. And it should be.
The bill tests, for instance, a number of ways that federal insurers could pay for care. Medicare and Medicaid currently pay clinicians the same amount regardless of results. But there is a pilot program to increase payments for doctors who deliver high-quality care at lower cost, while reducing payments for those who deliver low-quality care at higher cost. There’s a program that would pay bonuses to hospitals that improve patient results after heart failure, pneumonia, and surgery. There’s a program that would impose financial penalties on institutions with high rates of infections transmitted by health-care workers. Still another would test a system of penalties and rewards scaled to the quality of home health and rehabilitation care.
Friday, December 18, 2009
Atul Gawande thinks the most important parts of the health-care bill might be the small parts:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment